Debate
Debate database is a repository tool which aims to collect and gather historical information, textual proofs, doctrinal theses, biographical traces of authors that performed principia before reading on the Sentences of Peter Lombard in the Medieval universities all across Europe.
Designed and edited by M. Brinzei in collaboration with the Debate-team.
Implementation and technical assistance: Zetta Cloud
Learn More
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://database.debate-erc.com/jspui/handle/123456789/424Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | JOHANNES HUSS | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-17T00:10:24Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-01-17T00:10:24Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://database.debate-erc.com/jspui/handle/123456789/424 | - |
| dc.title | Johannes (Brasiator) Frankensteyn | en_US |
| debate.associate.bibliography | - Frantisek M. Bartos, “Hus’s commentary on the Sentences of Peter Lombard,” in Communio viatorum 3 (1962), pp. 145-157 - Charles Lohr, “Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries,” in Traditio 26 (1970), pp. 135-216 -Maarten J. F. M. Hoenen, “Ideas, Institutions, and Public Scandal: Academic Debates in Late Medieval Scholasticism,” in Wycliffism and Hussitism: Contexts, Methods of Thinking, Writing, and Persuasion, c. 1360- c. 1460, ed. K. Ghosh, P. Soukup, Brepols, Turnhout 2021, pp. 29-72, here 49-54 - Stephen E. Lahey, “The Sentences Commentary of Jan Hus,” in A Companion to Jan Hus, ed. Šmahel and Pavlíček, pp. 130-169, p. 141 | en_US |
| debate.associate.order | OP | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Associates (socii) | |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in Debate are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.