1. Debate
  2. Debate Community
  3. Authors
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://database.debate-erc.com/jspui/handle/123456789/351
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBONSEMBLANTE BADUARIO DE PERAGAen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-16T00:19:51Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-16T00:19:51Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://database.debate-erc.com/jspui/handle/123456789/351-
dc.titleBONSEMBLANTE BADUARIO DE PERAGAen_US
dc.title.alternativeBonsembiante Badoeren_US
dc.title.alternativeBonsembiante de Padoueen_US
dc.title.alternativeBonsemblante de Peragaen_US
dc.title.alternativeBonsemblantes de Patavioen_US
debate.author.bibliography- F. Ehrle, Der Sentenzenkommentar Peters von Candia, Münster 1925, pp. 51-54 H. Elie, Le complexe significabile, Paris, Vrin, 1936 [Réédition : Le signifiable par complexe : la proposition et son objet, Paris, Vrin, 2000.], pp. 139-146. A. Zumkeller, O.S.A., Theology and History of the Augustinian School in the Middle Ages, Augustinian Heritage Institut 1996, p. 48. Perini, I, pp. 79-80 A. ZUMKELLER, Manuskripte von Werken der Autoren des Augustiner-Eremitenordens in mitteleuropäischen Bibliotheken, Würzbourg, 1966, p. 205. E. Ypma, “Notice sur le ‘Studium’ de Paris au cours de la deuxième moitié du XIVe siècle”, in Augustiniana 17 (1967), pp. 14-36. G. Nuchelmans, « The Opposition against the Theory of the Complexe Significabile », in Theories of the Proposition, Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity, Amsterdam /London, North-Holland Publishing Company, 1973, pp. 239-240. N.G. Gilbert, “Ockham, Wyclif, and the ‘Via Moderna’, in Antiqui und Moderni (Miscellanea Mediaevali, 9) Berlin 1974, pp. 121-122 (relation with Petrarca) C. SCHABEL, The Quarrel with Aureol: Peter Aureol's Role in the late-medieval debate over divine foreknowledge and future contingents, 1315-1475, vol. I (unpublished PhD) University of Iowa 1994, pp. 308-311 Trapp, “Augustinian Theology of the 14th Century: Notes on Editions, Marginalia, Opinions and Book Lore”, in Augustiniana 6 (1956), pp. 247, 268. K. Tachau, « French Theology in the Mid-Fourteenth Century: Vatican Latin 986 and Wroclaw, Milich F.64 », in Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 51 (1984), p. 41-80, esp. 46-47, 65. K. Tachau, « The Quaestiones in primum librum Sententiarum of Andreas de Novocastro, O. F. M. », in Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 59 (1992), pp. 289-318, here pp. 303-307. O. Utamura, “Paris, 1358-59: The Principia of Bonsembiante of Padua,” (forthcoming)en_US
debate.author.orderOSAen_US
debate.author.birth1327en_US
debate.author.death1369en_US
debate.date.start1327en_US
debate.date.end1369en_US
debate.author.educationhttp://studium.univ-paris1.fr/individus/1552-bonsemblansbaduariodeperagaen_US
debate.author.birthplacePaduaen_US
debate.author.deathplacePaduaen_US
debate.work.notesPrincipium I: Utrum divina notitia Verbi productiva cuiuslibet verbi in ipso presentati fuerit eternaliter inefallibilis evidentia. Principium II: Utrum solo incommunicabili Verbo increate potential creaturas quaslibet in esse produxerit? Principium III:Utrumm anime unite Verbo fuerit communicate notitita omnium futurorum ad utrumlibet contingentium. Principium IV: Utrum beatificatis future revelata in Verbo infallibiliter presententur.en_US
Appears in Collections:Authors

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Bonsembinate-Clm 26711.docx8.13 MBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open

Vat.lat.981_0218_fa_0105r_m.jpg79.33 kBJPEGThumbnail
View/Open

Show simple item record Show TEI document


Items in Debate are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.